| User | Post |
|
6:27 pm November 6, 2009
| matthew
RCC Dedicated
| | | |
|
| posts 38 |
|
|
You can lose the same amount of water in winter and under that warm clothing you can easily lose a bit more…so keep drinking well!
Oh so true. I take out the same amount of liquid as I do when in the Summer. Its cold when it goes down the throat, but its still needed.
|
|
|
2:50 pm November 6, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
So its dark nights and colder weather. For most road riders this is the time to get the best bike cleaned oiled and greased so it can be put away until spring next year. This saves your best bike from the rigours of wet and salty roads which cause havoc with your bike components.
Also if you have any small mechanical problems on the best bike get them sorted now before you put the bike away so that you dont forget about them over the winter.
Tom has started the winter clothing thread already and is thinking about getting wrapped up a bit more! One thing when you are out winter riding don't be fooled into thinking you need less hydration. You can lose the same amount of water in winter and under that warm clothing you can easily lose a bit more…so keep drinking well!
|
|
|
5:43 pm October 30, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
Yes Dan …get your own thread 
|
|
|
5:31 pm October 30, 2009
| Dan Joyce
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 183 |
|
|
Debbie's got a 15in Giant 29er on test at the moment. So not just taller folk. Have a spin on it.
But I've probably derailled this thread enough. If you listen to Mark, you will go faster, cos he'll fine-tune your engine. If you listen to me, you'll just end up ****ing around with your bike. But hey - it might work. 
|
|
|
5:25 pm October 30, 2009
| Toms
I love RCC!
| | | |
|
| posts 207 |
|
|
29ers are reckonmended for taller folk, i for one will be sticking to 26 i think
|
|
|
5:21 pm October 30, 2009
| Dan Joyce
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 183 |
|
|
Tommo said:
Feel is the most important factor when you're on the bike don't forget that.
I agree.
I'm not saying shorter cranks are THE answer. Just an answer.
On the other hand, longer cranks aren't a free lunch way to produce more power. If you like 'em and if you're not planning on a particularly fast cadence, go for it. But to test it, go up by 5mm at least. 2.5mm either way is pretty much irrelevant (apart from a small effect on saddle height). Even 5mm isn't that much. We routinely make that jump going from a road bike (170mm) to a mountain bike (175mm) and most of us barely notice.
I've used 180mm cranks on a singlespeed mountain bike and I found them awful. They really messed up my cadence when I was spinning. I swapped to 170mm and put on a sprocket that was one tooth bigger. (That is, reduced the effective gear, which is all that you're doing by using longer cranks.)
On variable gears, you can - and I would argue, will - adjust your cadence and/or your gear to suit your crank length. So if you're not careful, it can be a zero sum game, e.g. you'll stay on top of that high gear and it'll feel easier, but you could be pedalling slower. So power output - and speed - is the same. Mark well Mark's words about power, further up.
I'm on 167.5mm cranks (no particular reason - they came on the bike) and am looking to reduce them further. When you're chained to your one gear choice, you sometimes have to spin. I can't do that so easily on longer cranks.
No particular conclusion to all this, though - except to experiment and find out what works for you. I think most top TTers are wrong to use longer cranks (I think they've just got better engines). But the evidence so far is arguably against me. 
But just you wait! In 10 years, everyone will be on 160mm. Or 150mm. And probably 29ers when they're riding off-road. 
If not, I'll be the first to admit I got it wrong. Meantime, boo to the norm! 
|
|
|
6:02 am October 30, 2009
| Tommo
RCC VIP
| | | |
|
| posts 120 |
|
|
Feel is the most important factor when you're on the bike don't forget that.
I dropped my bars down during the summer to there lowest setting which was 15mm down on what I started with at the start of the year. The thinking was 'super low = super aero', wrong I was to cramped up and couldn't breath as well due to the fact that my chest (lungs) were lower as well, also there was more pressure on my lower back. With the bars higher up I am much more comfortable and the result is faster times even though it's less aero. Hutch is the same if you look at his position, it's very 'sit-up' and un-aero.
The change in cranks will therefore not be an issue with knees hitting chest as there are no where near anyway + my saddle is a little too low as it is so the 5mm crank drop might make it just right.
If Bowdler uses 165mm don't worry about it he has a very weird set-up anyway with a mega chainring with 70 odd teeth. I've talked to loads of top TT'ers this year and 177.5's are the norm.
|
|
|
7:56 pm October 29, 2009
| Dan Joyce
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 183 |
|
|
Post edited 12:28 am - October 30, 2009 by Dan Joyce
Longer cranks can feel nice because what they do, in effect, is lower your gearing. You've got more leverage to get the same gear around, so you don't have to strain quite so hard on the pedals. But as Mark rightly says, going faster is about cadence and gearing - not just pushing bigger gears. And it's harder to get a fast cadence with longer cranks than shorter ones.
Also, the big issue for time triallists is aerodynamics. With shorter cranks, you get to raise the saddle relative to the handlebars - so you're effectively lowering the front end of the bike a bit. Going from 170 to 165 wins you a 5mm relative drop in bar height. It also give you 5mm more room between your knees and your chest on top of that, so you can drop the bar height by another 5mm without having your chest thumped by your knees - a net gain of 10mm at the front of your bike. If you can push the shorter cranks around as fast as the longer ones in a given gear, you should go faster cos you'll be a bit more aero (actually, you'd be going the same speed but you'd be using less energy!). Last year's BAR was won on 165mm cranks.
I fancy having a go on some 150mm cranks…
|
|
|
7:03 pm October 29, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
matthew said:
Yesterday, I went for a run. Its been a few months since my last run and think that it is a good work out for the time you do it. I usualy keep my running to a minimum - just over the bleak winter months.
Why do my legs ache so much the day after? I know after a few weeks of running again, the ache does go, but why the initial “hurt” the following day? What is happening to my muscles?
To spin, or not to spin. You may know that I am a spinner! But I have read that there is a benefit for mixing it up. Ive seen a lot of TT'ers with a really slow cadence. I want to do well in TT's next year - I want to beat Tommo - should I practice a slower, more powerful cadence?
Thanks for the last reply by the way.
Is the aching from fatigue and not aches around joints? If it is aching and I think that is what you are talking about then this fatigue will be from microscopic tears from doing an exercise you are not used to this fatigue is sometimes called DOMS or delayed onset mucsle soreness downhill runing causes the most soreness. There is also some schools of thought that say it is the repair of the muscle which causes soreness. This repair causes swelling of the muscle in their compartments which causes the pressure and pain.
Spin or not is not the issue - Power is what you need more of it - which is created by faster cadence and harder gears. You need to build strength to be able to push a larger gear. This strength training can be done on the bike or off with weight training. The best is weight training. Yes pushing a big gear will help to build strength but you need to do speed work as well then put them both together.
|
|
|
6:24 pm October 29, 2009
| Tommo
RCC VIP
| | | |
|
| posts 120 |
|
|
Cheers Mark - 180's it is then (840×0.216=181.44)
Seems a bit scary long so might go for 177.5's - I've been on 172.5 since I started so we'll see ???
Might as well jump over 175's a make a more obvious change, keeping my old cranks as a back up. 
|
|
|
5:45 pm October 29, 2009
| matthew
RCC Dedicated
| | | |
|
| posts 38 |
|
|
Yesterday, I went for a run. Its been a few months since my last run and think that it is a good work out for the time you do it. I usualy keep my running to a minimum - just over the bleak winter months.
Why do my legs ache so much the day after? I know after a few weeks of running again, the ache does go, but why the initial “hurt” the following day? What is happening to my muscles?
To spin, or not to spin. You may know that I am a spinner! But I have read that there is a benefit for mixing it up. Ive seen a lot of TT'ers with a really slow cadence. I want to do well in TT's next year - I want to beat Tommo - should I practice a slower, more powerful cadence?
Thanks for the last reply by the way.
|
|
|
5:01 pm October 29, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
Tommo said:
Coach - 172.5, 175 or 177.5 ??? and the reasons behind the answer.
(5ft 11in with slightly longer legs than the height would sugest)
Cheers
There are a number of suggested ways to get an ideal crank length this is generally based on the fact that longer legged riders will need longer cranks the most common calculation is:
inseam in mm x 0.216 = crank length
BUT the outcome may give you a crank that is not readily available so choose a common crank length nearest the calculation. Remember change in a crank length will mean a change in saddle height as well.
The length of the crank can also relate to the type of riding you are doing so longer cranks means less force to push the same gear ratio but you will find it harder to get a faster cadence. Therefore longer cranks would generally be good for time trialling and shorter cranks good for quick accelerations in road races and track.
So for you Tommo measure your inseam and see what you get - I would guess you would be wanting around 175 or 177.5 for Time Trial.
|
|
|
3:39 pm October 29, 2009
| Tommo
RCC VIP
| | | |
|
| posts 120 |
|
|
Coach - 172.5, 175 or 177.5 ??? and the reasons behind the answer.
(5ft 11in with slightly longer legs than the height would sugest)
Cheers
|
|
|
3:54 am October 29, 2009
| matthew
RCC Dedicated
| | | |
|
| posts 38 |
|
|
Re. Turbo training. You will also need an old towel over the bike to soak up the sweat!
I aggree, you must have a structured training plan for the turbo otherwise its mind numbing.
|
|
|
7:01 pm October 28, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
Well thats the one I have that you can borrow - the model iI have has resistance.
|
|
|
5:50 pm October 28, 2009
| Matt Schofield
RCC Dedicated
| | | |
|
| posts 47 |
|
|
Thanks I'd like to try one out, I think i'll probably c if i can get one for xmas or something, seen this one it looks quite good
http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycl…..360012878/
|
|
|
5:39 pm October 28, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
Post edited 9:40 pm - October 28, 2009 by Mark G
Matt Schofield said:
are turbo-trainers any good? i'm thinking about getting one but I don't know much about them or what spec to look for in one 
Matt
Love them or hate them they are good for training when the weather is bad, you are short of time or you want a controlled interval session.
The turbos have different types of resistance:
- air resistance - these are noisy with a fan wheel. These were the original type but not good for using in the house>
- Fluid - the fan is sat in some oil so it is quieter and smooth.
- Magnetic - not as smooth as fluid but still quieter than air resistance.
- electronic - expensive very expensive! .
- Last is an indoor trainer that is seeing a large comeback and is good for balance - rollers. Difficult to master.
You can pick up plenty of second hand indoor trainers. Have a look on ebay and see if anyone in the club is selling one also speak to debbie and see what you can get new in your budget. In the meantime if you want to borrow one then let me know I have one you can borrow to see if you like the concept!
|
|
|
5:07 pm October 28, 2009
| Dan Joyce
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 183 |
|
|
Even basic turbo trainers are useful for interval training (ride hard, take it easy, ride hard again etc.). I got one second hand for £25. If you're going to use one, you really want a pulse monitor (cheap ones cost from about £25 upwards and are fine), plus a clock or stopwatch in the room the turbo is in, if the pulse monitor doesn't have one. Just pedalling on the turbo is soul destroying - you need some kind of routine (Mark can advise) and some LOUD music.
|
|
|
4:35 pm October 28, 2009
| Matt Schofield
RCC Dedicated
| | | |
|
| posts 47 |
|
|
are turbo-trainers any good? i'm thinking about getting one but I don't know much about them or what spec to look for in one 
|
|
|
2:34 pm October 28, 2009
| Mark G
Moderator
| | | |
|
| posts 344 |
|
|
Any more questions on training?
|
|